Chinese Fraternalism
Chinese 'Freemasonry', as it has come to be known, stems from very old benefit societies probably introduced here when immigrants from China came to the gold rush settlements of Victoria, New South Wales and Queensland in the 1850's. In ritual details and in format completely unlike Freemasonry of either the British or the mainland European varieties, these brethren, nevertheless, swore an oath of secrecy and allegiance to 'the brotherhood' and lived by rules which exhorted them to observe a similar philosophy of mutual aid and 'mateship'. Lepper has provided a valuable, concise summary of the 36 rules of the Heaven and Earth Brotherhood, for example:
If a brother be poor, you must help him; otherwise may
you die on the road;
A brother must nourish another brother; if you have food you must share it with him; if you do not may a tiger devour you;
He who commits adultery with a brother's wife, let him be run through with a sword;
He who mentions the thirty-six oaths of the brotherhood must have two hundred and sixteen strokes of the red wood.
In one version, the movement's adherents fled from mainland China as political refugees known as Hung Mun to offshore havens including to Australia from where reports of 'a new gold mountain' were circulating. More recent scholarship disputes this claim, asserting that the bulk of migrants were deliberately brought by agents established in Australia and that this was a major function of the 'lodges'.
It has been estimated that about 20 million Chinese migrated overseas during and since the 19th century. Most worked as labourers in mining, on road construction and as farm hands. In contrast to extensive material published on these societies in South East Asia and North America, very little has been made available with regard to their history in this country, partly because of few known primary resources.
In 1992, the Bendigo Chinese Association found a 'Hongmen cabalistic tract'. This has now been translated. With work on gravestones, other records and surviving temple artifacts, comparisons have been able to begin. Any Hongmen member possessing such a manuscript could propogate the association, so whether a tract was a transcribed copy or had been purchased or inherited, whoever possessed it 'could disseminate the society and become a headman.'
Not that Bendigo was a naturally receptive environment. Holdsworth, curator and researcher at the Goldfields Research Centre, Bendigo in 2006, believed that Bendigo was unusual amongst Victorian towns with Chinese 'lodges.' Being an extremely 'unionised' town, for example, the original source of the Amalgamated Miners' Association, Bendigo was the last amongst Victorian towns to accept Chinese involvement in cultural life. It was also the home base of the architect of legislation disenfranchising Chinese residents, the man who later became Sir John Quick.
John Fitzgerald, now at La Trobe University, disputes much of this, also pointing to recent research. He argues that this shows that in Bendigo the white community leadership worked closely with the Chinese community to ensure continuous participation in local affairs, though not always without tension. Holdsworth argues that members of friendly societies withdrew their support in the late 1880's when local authorities gave money to the Chinese 'lodge' to participate in community events but none to them.
Fitzgerald believes there is no evidence that Chinese 'lodges' subsequently started calling themselves 'Masonic' to ward off racist attacks. The newly-opened archives of NSW's United Grand Lodge are providing insights into connections between Freemasonry and the Yee Hing networks in late 19th and early 20th century Sydney. However, the label 'Masonic' remains problematic. Fitzgerald suggests it was more likely a case of 'uneducated country folk' attempting to attain a cloak of greater respectability by adopting the name, with no attempt made to formalize a connection with official Freemasonry.
This is possibly the case with Quong Tart who died a respected Sydney businessman widely regarded as the first Australian Chinese member of a regular Masonic lodge. He had earlier been a member of 'the Foresters' and the IOOFMU, his wife later claiming him to have been the first Chinese man elected to an Odd Fellows lodge in NSW. Naturalised in 1871, he joined MU's Unity Lodge No 46 at Araluen, a small mining camp near Braidwood, NSW. When that closed he must have transferred to Miners' Refuge, No 73, at Major's Creek, his 'brothers' presenting him with an Illuminated Address in March, 1881. At his death in 1903, the Professional Musicians Association Brass Band played, the Presbyterian Archdeacon spoke and the Very Worthy Brother FR Bretnall, Past Grand Registrar and Secretary of the Lodge of Tranquility read the Masonic burial service attended by forty other brethren.
The Hongmen Tiandihui was more accurately a fraternal mutual benefit society utilizing the distinguishing features of oaths, secret ritual and regalia, all directed at obligating members to help one another especially at times of hardship and calamity. I am tempted to refer to it as a Friendly Society of the ANA kind, because it had explicitly political objectives. As Cai Shaoqing has it:
The numerous Chinese labourers were away from home,
helpless and isolated. They joined the Hongmen as
sworn brothers for mutual support to protect their
livelihood and mutual interests, and to counter racist
discrimination and mistreatment by the colonial
government and the white colonialists.
This author describes three stages in the society's development. The first, from 1851 to 1875, was, roughly, the period of arrival, establishment and expansion. Cai Shaoqing deduces around half the Chinese population in the country were members. From 1875 to 1900, all Chinese were harshly treated by non-Chinese and the Society was inactive or very circumspect. Many Chinese moved to the cities and took up other occupations. The third stage, 1901 to 1921 was marked by rising Chinese nationalism and transformation of the Society into a social and political force. Its organisation actively opposed the 'White Australia' policy, set up a newspaper and agitated for the establishment of a Chinese Consulate in Sydney. It was in this period that Clubs were established and the title 'Masonic' adopted.
Price quotes Oddie's MA thesis to the effect that an Anti-Chinese League, revived by the United Furniture Trade Society in Victoria in 1887-89:
received considerable support from the [ANA], a
combined benevolent and political association for
professional men, business men and small farmers
(with) branches in many suburbs and country towns,
most of whom wished to keep the Australian continent
free for a predominantly Anglo-Saxon race and society,
and for other Europeans willing and able to conform to
British-Australian ways.
The Anti-Chinese League, in Price's paraphrase of Oddie, sought to convince:
every voter and member that Chinese were socially
undesirable and economically dangerous, that all
future immigration should be prohibited, that Chinese
residents should pay an annual residence tax of 20
(Pounds), that no further Chinese should be
naturalized, and that any naturalized Chinese leaving
the colony, even for a short trip, should at once lose
his citizenship.
The League apparently won 'support from many other Unions', organized numerous meetings in suburbs and country towns, and sent deputations to Parliament in July and August, 1887. Similar activities occurred in NSW and Queensland, where, as in Victoria, emotions had been roused by an economic recession which lasted well into the 1890's.
Another disputed assertion is that unlike their countrymen in other countries, the Chinese in Australia were culturally homogeneous and that inter-racial battles between 'lodges' were rare. One widely acknowledged exception was a fierce armed conflict in Melbourne in 1904 between Hongmen and the Bao Liang Society over opium and gambling interests, after which the Bao Liang lost credibility and dissolved around 1912. There was also a period of 'faction fights' in Sydney's George Street in 1892. Quong Tart, with others, convened a conciliating committee and though abused by some Chinese for opportunism succeeded in apparently easing tensions between a Loon-Ye-Tong group and a Dwoon Goon group.
In his recent book, Chinese Lodges in Australia, the Bendigo tract's translator, Kok Hu Jin has concluded:
firstly, that the overseas pursuit of gold had to be a
group enterprise, involving mutual dependency and
support; second, that lodges generally reflected
pre-migration bonds and associations, and thirdly, that
each lodge maintained its own temple for the local
membership, and was directly involved in sponsorship of
more immigrants. The temple was therefore, 'office,
headquarters, meeting place and ceremonial centre.'
His research approach exposes clear similarities to fraternals drawn from Europe, and thus suggests paths not yet pursued by scholars of 'our' lodges. For example:
Many artefacts…identify the lodges with which the
temple followers who donated them were affiliated. In
turn, one may then trace links, whether of common
geographic origin, ancestry, clan or language, between
groups of immigrants scattered far and wide around the
Australian continent.
Dr Kok Hu Jin sets out the various names under which the Hung League family of brotherhood associations have been known - 'the Heaven and Earth Society', 'the Heaven-Earth-League', 'the Three United Society (Heaven, Earth, Man)' and the 'Triad Society of Heaven and Earth Society.' After the British Government ordered the breaking up of the Society on the Malay Peninsular in the late 19th century, some surviving factions went underground and degenerated into gangsterism, the now dreaded 'triads'.
He believes that it was Sun Yat Sen, 20th century nationalist and republican, who undertook from mainland China the reorganization of the Hungmen which resulted in the adoption of the label 'Masonic' in Australia, and presumably elsewhere. Fitzgerald finds this connection unlikely, especially for Australia. Interestingly, Dr Sun's emblem, adopted by the Nationalists in China, was a 12-rayed rising sun. In the North American case, researchers have claimed that:
At the turn of the century Sun Yat-Sen obtained
considerable financial support from chapters of the
Chih-kung T'ang in North America. In San Francisco
over 2,000,000 dollars in revolutionary currency was
printed. In British Columbia the chapters mortgaged
their buildings to raise money for the republican
cause.
All of which suggests there is much more to be learnt about the Australian variants of these organisations.